Plataformas digitais cooperativas na perspectiva das organizações públicas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20401/rasi.10.3.885Palavras-chave:
Plataformas digitais cooperativas, Organizações públicas, Empreendedorismo institucional, Governança, Plataformas Digitais.Resumo
As inovações em tecnologias da informação e comunicação (TIC) têm impulsionado uma nova e intensa transformação digital, situação que envolve, inclusive, organizações públicas. Este estudo utiliza preceitos teóricos da economia de plataforma, das cooperativas de plataforma e do empreendedorismo institucional para analisar o empreendedorismo institucional das organizações públicas através da promoção de plataformas cooperativas de serviço. Portanto, este artigo tem como objetivo compreender como as organizações públicas podem promover o processo empreendedor por meio de plataformas cooperativas no Brasil. A pesquisa utilizou procedimentos exploratórios de pesquisa qualitativa, sob o método de estudo de caso, para compreender a dinâmica do empreendedorismo institucional que promove cooperativas de plataforma. Como principais achados, foram constatadas evidências de uma estratégia de empreendedorismo institucional por parte de um município através de incubação de empreendimentos baseados no cooperativismo de plataformas. Os achados sugerem mudanças no regime institucional das plataformas digitais, que passam de uma orientação estritamente capitalista para uma orientação cooperativa, caracterizada pela propriedade coletiva sobre recursos, dados, estruturas de trabalho e autogovernança. Os resultados demonstram que organizações públicas participam de algumas fases do processo empreendedor promovendo o cooperativismo de plataformas. Este estudo contribui para a compreensão de como as organizações públicas podem promover o trabalho por meio de plataformas digitais, em especial o microempreendedorismo individual, diminuindo-se, consequentemente, o trabalho informal.
Downloads
Referências
Acquier, A., Daudigeos, T., & Pinkse, J. (2017). Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: An organizing framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 1-10. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.006
Ametowobla, D., & Kirchner, S. (2022). The organization of digital platforms: Architecture and interfaces in a partial organization perspective. In: Ametowobla, D., & Kirchner, S. (Eds.), Working Paper "Fachgebiet Digitalisierung der Arbeitswelt". Technische Universität Berlin: Berlim.
Amoros, J. E., & Bosma, N. (2014). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2013 Global Report. Londres, Reino Unido: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA). https://www.gemconsortium.org/file/open?fileId=48772
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2018). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux030
Balestrin, A., & Verschoore, J. (2016). Redes de Cooperação Empresarial: Estratégias de Gestão na Nova Economia. Bookman.
Baratter, M. A., Ferreira, J. M., & Costa, M. C. (2009). Empreendedorismo institucional: considerações sobre imersão e mecanismo da teorização. XXXIII Encontro Da Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação em Administração, São Paulo, SP.
Bardin, L. (2016). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.
Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65-107. http://doi.org/10.1080/19416520903053598
Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595-1600. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.001
Benkler, Y. (2017). Peer production, the commons, and the future of the firm. Strategic Organization, 15(2), 264-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016652606
Bonina, C., Koskinen, K., Eaton, B., & Gawer, A. (2021). Digital platforms for development: Foundations and research agenda. Information Systems Journal, 31(6), 869-902. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12326
Brasil. (2008). Lei Complementar 128, de 19 de dezembro de 2008. Altera a Lei Complementar no 123, de 14 de dezembro de 2006, altera as Leis nos 8.212, de 24 de julho de 1991, 8.213, de 24 de julho de 1991, 10.406, de 10 de janeiro de 2002 – Código Civil, 8.029, de 12 de abril de 1990, e dá outras providências. Presidência da República, Brasília/DF.
Bunders, D. J., Arets, M., Frenken, K., & De Moor, T. (2022). The feasibility of platform cooperatives in the gig economy. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, 10(1), 100167. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2022.100167
Cardoso, Luís Miguel. (2021) Cyberculture: redefining culture and literature in cyberspace. Pattaya Int’l Conference on Business, Literature, Psychology & Music (PBLPM-21), XXXIII Anais eletrônicos, Pattaya: [s. n.], 5-8. http://uruae.org/siteadmin/upload/9410UH0321404.pdf
Carter, C., Spence, C., & McKinlay, A. (2020). Strategic change, leadership and accounting: A triptych of organizational reform. Public Administration, 98(1), 62-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12550
Como, E., Mathis, A., Tognetti, M., & Rapisardi, A. (2016, September). Cooperative platforms in a European landscape: an exploratory study. ISIRC Conference, Glasgow, 35. https://coopseurope.coop/wp-content/uploads/files/Paper_Cooperatives%20Collab%20Economy__0.pdf
Costabile, C., Iden, J., & Bygstad, B. (2022). Building digital platform ecosystems through standardization: an institutional work approach. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 1877-1889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00552-0
Curtis, S. K., & Mont, O. (2020). Sharing economy business models for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121519
Da Silveira, A. B., Hoppen, N., & De Camillis, P. K. (2022). Flattening relations in the sharing economy: A framework to analyze users, digital platforms, and providers. In: Ertz, M. (Ed.). Handbook of Research on the Platform Economy and the Evolution of E-Commerce (26-51) IGI Global.
Da Silveira, A. B., Wegner, D., & Monticelli, J. M. (2022). Platform Cooperativism as an Alternative to Post-Covid-19 Economic Development. Anais SEMEAD – Seminários em Administração, 25, São Paulo, SP.
Dalmoro, M., Wegner, D., & Schiavini, J. M. (2023). Princípios do Cooperativismo de Plataforma na Construção de Arranjos de Mercado. Revista Interdisciplinar de Marketing, 13(1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.4025/rimar.v13i1.66452
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. Zucker (Ed), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (3-21). Ballinger Publishing.
De Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R. C. (2018). The digital platform: a research agenda. Journal of information technology, 33(2), 124-135. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3
Dreyer, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F., Hamann, R., & Faccer, K. (2017). Upsides and downsides of the sharing economy: Collaborative consumption business models' stakeholder value impacts and their relationship to context. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 87-104. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.036
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, D. L., Coombs, C., Constantiou, I., Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Upadhyay, N. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: Transforming education, work and life. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102211. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102211
EasyCoop. (2022). Por meio de cooperativa Araraquara cria app próprio de transporte na cidade. EasyCoop. Cooperativismo em Revista. https://easycoop.com.br/Noticias/52393/Por-meio-de-cooperativa-Araraquara-cria-app-proprio-de-transporte-na-cidade
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
Ertz, M. (2020). Collaborative consumption, a buzzword that has gone conceptual: Three shades of the sharing economy. Oikonomics, 14(14), 1-14. http://doi.org/10.7238/o.n14.2011
Ertz, M., & Boily, É. (2019). The rise of the digital economy: Thoughts on blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies for the collaborative economy. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 3(4), 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2019.12.002
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1980). Cultural orientations, institutional entrepreneurs, and social change: Comparative analysis of traditional civilizations. American journal of sociology, 85(4), 840-869.
Foramitti, J., Varvarousis, A., & Kallis, G. (2020). Transition within a transition: how cooperative platforms want to change the sharing economy. Sustainability Science, 15(4), 1185-1197. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00804-y
Frenken, K., Vaskelainen, T., Fünfschilling, L., & Piscicelli, L. (2020). An institutional logics perspective on the gig economy. Maurer, I., Mair, J., & Oberg, A. (Ed.) Theorizing the sharing economy: Variety and trajectories of new forms of organizing. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 66, 83-105. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20200000066005
Friedland, R. and Alford, R. R. (1991). ‘Bringing society back in symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions’. In: W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio (Eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 232–66.
Garud, R., Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization studies, 28(7), 957-969.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607078958
Gawer, A. R., & Srnicek, N. (2021). Online platforms: Economic and societal effects. Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/656336/EPRS_STU(2021)656336_EN.pdf
Gbadegeshin, S. A., Al Natsheh, A., Ghafel, K., Mohammed, O., Koskela, A., Rimpiläinen, A., ... & Kuoppala, A. (2022). Overcoming the valley of death: A new model for high technology startups. Sustainable Futures, 4, 100077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2022.100077
Gerwe, O., & Silva, R. (2020). Clarifying the sharing economy: Conceptualization, typology, antecedents, and effects. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(1), 65-96. http://doi.org/ 10.5465/amp.2017.0010
Grohmann, R. (2022). Beyond platform cooperativism: worker-owned platforms in Brazil. Interactions, 29(4), 87-89. https://doi.org/10.1145/3540251
Helberger, N., Pierson, J., & Poell, T. (2018). Governing online platforms: From contested to cooperative responsibility. Information Society, 34(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1391913
Hidalgo, G., Dalmoro, M., & Monticelli, J. M. (2023). Empreendedorismo institucional na formação de novos mercados: Transferência das lógicas da biodinâmica para práticas de mercado. Organizações Rurais & Agroindustriais, 25, e1960-e1960. https://www.revista.dae.ufla.br/index.php/ora/article/view/1960
Hossain, M. (2021). The effect of the Covid-19 on sharing economy activities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124782
Jiao, H., Wang, L., & Shi, Y. (2022). How does institutional environment in the digital context affect technology entrepreneurship? The moderating roles of government digitalization and gender. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35(7), 1089-1112. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-10-2021-0321
Kirchner, S., & Schüßler, E. (2019). The organization of digital marketplaces: Unmasking the role of internet platforms in the sharing economy. Organization Outside Organization, 131-154.
Klarin, A., & Suseno, Y. (2021). A state-of-the-art review of the sharing economy: Scientometric mapping of the scholarship. Journal of Business Research, 126, 250-262. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.063
Kogure, Y., Kobayashi, N., Kawase, M., Shirasaka, S., & Ioki, M. (2019). Proposal of Entrepreneur's Behavior Process for Overcoming Japanese Type Valley of Death in Startup Companies. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 8(S3), 102-112.
Leca, B., Battilana, J., & Boxenbaum, E. (2008). Agency and institutions: A review of institutional entrepreneurship (08-096). Harvard Business School.
Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657-679. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159610
Mair, J., & Reischauer, G. (2017). Capturing the dynamics of the sharing economy: Institutional research on the plural forms and practices of sharing economy organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 11-20. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.023
Martin, C. J. (2016). The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecological Economics, 121, 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.027
Martin, C. J., Upham, P., & Klapper, R. (2017). Democratising platform governance in the sharing economy: An analytical framework and initial empirical insights. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 1395-1406. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.123
Morell, M. F., & Espelt, R. (2019). A framework to assess the sustainability of platform economy: The case of Barcelona ecosystem. Sustainability, 11(22), 6450. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226450
Mendes, G. (2020). Cooperativismo de Plataforma: a democratização dos serviços digitais. https://coonecta.me/cooperativismo-de-plataforma-a-democratizacaodos-servicos-digitais
Mukerji, M., & Roy, P. S. (2019). Platform Interactions and Emergence of an Organizational Field: Case Study on Ola. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 23. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v23i0.2113
Muñoz, P., & Cohen, B. (2017). Mapping out the sharing economy: A configurational approach to sharing business modeling. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.035
Muñoz, P., & Cohen, B. (2018). A compass for navigating sharing economy business models. California Management Review, 61(1), 114-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125618795490
Novkovic, S. (2008). Defining the co-operative difference. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(6), 2168-2177. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.02.009
Opara, M., Okafor, O. N., Ufodike, A., & Kalu, K. (2021). Institutional entrepreneurship: collaborative change in a complex Canadian organization. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(9), 284-314. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2020-4610
Papadimitropoulos, E. (2021). Platform capitalism, platform cooperativism, and the commons. Rethinking Marxism, 33(2), 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2021.1893108
Paul, J., Alhassan, I., Binsaif, N., & Singh, P. (2023). Digital entrepreneurship research: A systematic review. Journal of Business Research, 156, 113507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113507
Pazaitis, A., Kostakis, V., & Bauwens, M. (2017). Digital economy and the rise of open cooperativism: the case of the Enspiral Network. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916683865
Pelzer, P., Frenken, K., & Boon, W. (2019). Institutional entrepreneurship in the platform economy: How Uber tried (and failed) to change the Dutch taxi law. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 33, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.02.003
Platform Cooperativism Consortium. (2023). What Is a Platform Co-op? https://platform.coop/
Programa Coopera da Prefeitura de Araraquara. (2022) Disponível em: https://www.legislacaodigital.com.br/Araraquara-SP/LeisOrdinarias/10161/Arquivos/2 acesso em: 18 de novembro/2022.
Qiu, S., Xu, Z., & Bhatt, B. (2021). The sharing economy platforms in rural China: Bridging institutional voids through institutional entrepreneurship. In Sharing economy at the base of the pyramid (75–99). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2414-8_4
Reuter, E. (2022). Hybrid business models in the sharing economy: The role of business model design for managing the environmental paradox. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(2), 603-618. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2939
Rodrigues, S. R. V., Wolkmer, M. D. F. S., & Menezes, M. S. (2022). Uberização, lutas sociais e pandemia. Revista Estudos Institucionais, 8(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.21783/rei.v8i1.599
Sandoval, M. (2020). Entrepreneurial activism? Platform cooperativism between subversion and co-optation. Critical Sociology, 46(6), 801-817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920519870577
Schlagwein, D., Schoder, D. & Spindeldreher, K. (2020). Consolidated, systemic conceptualization, and definition of the “sharing economy”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(7), 817-838. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24300
Schneider, N. (2018). An Internet of ownership: Democratic design for the online economy. The Sociological Review, 66(2), 320-340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118758533
Scholz, T. (2016). Platform cooperativism: Challenging the corporate sharing economy. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, 118(4), 2-28.
Scholz, T., & Schneider, N. (Orgs.) (2017). Ours to hack and to own: The rise of platform cooperativism, a new vision for the future of work and a fairer internet. OR books.
Schor, J. (2021). After the gig: How the sharing economy got hijacked and how to win it back. University of California Press.
Seo, M.-G., & Creed, W.E.D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222-247. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134353
Solel, Y. (2019). If uber were a cooperative: a democratically biased analysis of platform economy. The Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 13(2), 239-262. http://doi.org/10.1515/lehr-2019-2007
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative science quarterly, 50(1), 35-67.
Sundararajan, A. (2014). Peer-to-peer businesses and the sharing (collaborative) economy: Overview, economic effects and regulatory issues. Written testimony for the hearing titled ‘The Power of Connection: Peer to Peer Businesses’, 1-7. http://smallbusiness.house. gov/uploadedfiles/1-15-2014_revised_sundararajan_testimony pdf
Tseng, Y. C., & Chan, C. L. (2019). When the sharing economy meets established institutions: Uber and Airbnb in Taiwan. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(6), 1895-1906. http://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2934520
Vallas, S. & Schor, J. B. (2020) What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46(1), 273-294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857
Xiang, X., Wang, J., Long, Z., & Huang, Y. (2022). Improving the entrepreneurial competence of college social entrepreneurs: Digital government building, entrepreneurship education, and entrepreneurial cognition. Sustainability, 15(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010069
Yin, R. K. (2016). Pesquisa qualitativa do início ao fim. Penso Editora.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
A RASI, de acordo com a Lei nº 9.610, de 19.02.98 que altera, atualiza e consolida a legislação sobre direitos autorais e dá outras providências, adota as seguintes condições da Cessão de Direitos Autorais:
- A Revista de Administração Sociedade e Inovação (RASI) mantém, com a cessão dos direitos autorais, a posse dos direitos sobre os conteúdos por ela publicados;
- O autor retém seus direitos morais do conteúdo, incluindo o direito de ser identificado como autor sempre que o conteúdo for publicado;
- Apesar da atribuição dos direitos autorais o autor retém o direito de reutilizar o material em coleções futuras de seu próprio trabalho sem ônus. Os reconhecimentos da publicação anterior na RASI são as únicas exigências em tais casos;
- O autor pode fazer fotocópias do conteúdo, ou distribuí-lo por meio de correio eletrônico ou fax, desde que destinadas às suas próprias aulas e com finalidade de atender objetivos de pesquisa, sob a condição de que: (a) tais cópias não sejam revendidas e (b) referência a fonte original da publicação e o nome da RASI estejam indicados claramente em todas as cópias feitas do material.
