Digitization and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Study in the Organizational Sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20401/rasi.11.2.989Keywords:
Digitization, Sustainability, Bibliometric Analysis, Digital TransformationAbstract
Digitalization and sustainability are directly related topics, since digital technologies are powerful tools for promoting more sustainable practices. In this context, this study aims to explore the relationship between digitalization and sustainability in companies through bibliometric and social network analysis. The research was based on data collected from Web of Science, without time frame, with a total of 115 articles analyzed. For data analysis, the R Bibliometrix software was used, as it allowed us to map the main research trends, to identify the most influential authors and to highlight emerging themes at the intersection between digitalization and sustainability. The results showed a significant growth in scientific production between digitalizationand business sustainability from 2018 onwards, but there are still important gaps in the integration of these two areas. The main themes identified include innovation, performance, impact, and corporate social responsibility. Furthermore, it was found that countries such as China, Germany and the United Kingdom lead in the production of knowledge in this area. The study concludes that, although the convergence between digitalization and sustainability is in a prominent position, it is necessary to deepen investigations into how these practices can be effectively integrated to improve corporate performance and promote sustainable practices in different sectors.
Downloads
References
Aljanazrah, A., Yerousis, G., Hamed, G., & Khlaif, Z. N. (2022). Digital transformation in times of crisis: Challenges, attitudes, opportunities and lessons learned from students’ and faculty members’ perspectives. In: Frontiers in Education, 7, 1047035.
Al-Taani, A. H. M., Al-Zaqeba, M. A. A., Maabreh, H. M. A., & Jarah, B. A. F. (2024). Exploring the impact of digital accounting and digital zakat on improving business sustainability in the Middle East and Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 11(1), 56-67.
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
Arzo, S., & Hong, M. (2024). A roadmap to SDGs-emergence of technological innovation and infrastructure development for social progress and mobility. Environmental Research, 246, 118102.
Andrade, C., & Gonçalo, C. R. (2022). Plataformas e Ecossistemas: Recursos e Habilitadores na Digitalização Estratégica. Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação, 8(2), 96-118.
Bautista-Bernal, I., Quintana-García, C., & Marchante-Lara, M. (2021). Research trends in occupational health and social responsibility: a bibliometric analysis. Safety Science, 137, 105167.
Brenner, B., & Hartl, B. (2021). The perceived relationship between digitalization and ecological, economic, and social sustainability, Journal of Cleaner Production, 315, 128128.
Bretas, V. P. G., & Alon, I. (2021). Franchising research on emerging markets: bibliometric and content analyses. Journal of Business Research, 133, 51-65.
Chen, P. (2023). Curse or blessing? The relationship between sustainable development plans for resource cities and corporate sustainability - Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 341, 117988.
Cherrafi, A., Elfezazi, S., Chiarini, A., Mokhlis, A., & Benhida, K. (2016). The integration of lean manufacturing, Six Sigma and sustainability: A literature review and future research directions for developing a specific model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 828-846.
Drucker, P. The daily Drucker. Routledge, 1984.
Elkington, J. (2006). Governance for sustainability. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(6), 522-529.
Ferrer, J. A. G., Obilcnik, H., Paschoalinoto, N. W., & Bruno, D. O. T. (2022). Manufatura enxuta sustentável – metodologia de aplicação do mapeamento de fluxo de valor sustentável (SUS-VSM). Revista Brasileira de Mecatrônica, 4(3), 01-18.
Forcadell, F.J., Aracil, E., & Úbeda, F. (2020a). The Impact of Corporate Sustainability and
Digitalization on International Banks’ Performance. Glob Policy, 11, 18-27.
Forcadell, F. J., Aracil, E., & Úbeda, F. (2020b). Using reputation for corporate sustainability to tackle banks digitalization challenges. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29, 2181- 2193.
Gobble, M. M. (2018). Digitalization, Digitization, and Innovation. Research-Technology Management, 61(4), 56-59.
González-Ramírez, R., Gasco, J., & Llopis, J. Digitalisation and sustainability: their role in corporate social responsibility through innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.
Gupta, S., Motlagh, M., & Rhyner, J. (2020). The Digitalization Sustainability Matrix: A Participatory Research Tool for Investigating Digitainability. Sustainability, 12. 01-27.
Helleno, A. L., Moraes, A. J. I., & Simon, A. T. (2017). Integrating sustainability indicators and Lean Manufacturing to assess manufacturing processes: Application case studies in Brazilian industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 405-416.
Hao, Y., Wang, C., Yan, G., Irfan, M., & Chang, C. P. (2023). Identifying the nexus among environmental performance, digital finance, and green innovation: New evidence from prefecture-level cities in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 335,117554.
Isensee, C., Teuteberg, F., Griese, K. M., & Topi, C. (2020). The relationship between organizational culture, sustainability, and digitalization in SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122944.
Issah, W. B., Ferdous, L. T., Bhuiyan, F., & Sharif, T. (2024). Digitalisation and environmental management activities: The effects of family ownership`. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 4351–4374.
Ji, J., & Yi, Y. (2022). How do TMT conflicts affect exploratory innovation? The moderating effects of team task reflexivity. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(4), 813– 826.
Ji, H., Miao, Z., Wan, J., & Lin, L. (2022). Digital transformation and financial performance: the moderating role of entrepreneurs’ social capital. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(8), 1978–1995.
Ji, Y. G., Tao, W., & Rim, H. (2020). Mapping corporate social responsibility research in communication: a network and bibliometric analysis. Public Relations Review, 46(5).
Khatib, S. F. A., Abdullah, D. F., Hendrawaty, E., & Elamer, A. A. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of cash holdings literature: current status, development, and agenda for future research. Management Review Quarterly.
Lara, A. C., Oro, I. M., Bencke, F. F., Chais, C. (2022). Universidade Empreendedora: Um estudo bibliométrico acerca da produção científica. Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação, 8(2), 58-76.
Li, Q., Tang, W., & Li, Z. (2024). Leveraging Industry 4.0 for Sustainable Manufacturing: A Quantitative Analysis Using FI-RST. Applied Sciences, 14(20), 9545.
Lopes-Robles, J. R., Guallar, R., Gamboa-Rosales, N. K., Otegi-Olaso, J. R., & Cobo, M. J. (2019). Mapa de la estructura intelectual de El profesional de la infomarión de 2014 a 2018. Revista Académica sobre Documentación y Comunicación Interactiva, 19, 115-125.
Luthra, S., Mangla, S. K., & Yadav, G. (2019). An analysis of causal relationships among challenges impeding redistributed manufacturing in emerging economies, Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 949-962.
Magalhães, R., & Vendramini, A. (2018). Os impactos da Quarta Revolução Industrial. GVExecutivo, 17(1), 40-43.
Mishakov, V. Y., Dative, V. V., & Gordienko, M. S. (2021). Impact of digitalization on economic sustainability in developed and developing countries. In: Sustainable Development of Modern Digital Economy: Perspectives from Russian Experiences (pp. 265-274). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Nobanee, H., Hamadi, F. Y. A., Abdulaziz, F. A., Abukarsh, L. S., Alqahtani, A. F., Alsubaey, S. K., Alqahtani, S. M., & Almansoori, H. A. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of sustainability and risk management. Sustainability, 13(6), 3277.
O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2021). Lead and disrupt: How to solve the innovator's dilemma. Stanford University Press.
Ricci, E. C., & Banterle, A. (2020). Do major climate change-related public events have an impact on consumer choices? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 126, 109793.
Savitz, A. W., & Weber, K. (2014). The Tiple Bottom Line: How Today's Best-Run Companies Are Achieving Economic, Social and Environmental Success - and How You Can Too. San Francisco, California: Jossey-bass: A Wiley Brand, 352 p.
Seele, P. (2017). Predictive Sustainability Control: A review assessing the potential to transfer big data driven ‘predictive policing’ to corporate sustainability management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 673-686.
Slaper, T. F., & Hall T. J. (2011). The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it work. IBR Indiana Business Review, 4-8.
Ukko, J., Nasiri, M., Saunila, M., & Rantala, T. (2019). Sustainability strategy as a moderator in the relationship between digital business strategy and financial performance, Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117626.
Wang, W., Zhang, H., Sun, Z., Wang, L., Zhao, J., & Fengzhi Wu, F. (2023). Can digital policy improve corporate sustainability? Empirical evidence from China's national comprehensive big data pilot zones. Telecommunications Policy, 47(9), 102617.
Xu, G., Zhang, J., & Wang, S. (2024). How Digitalization and Sustainability Promote Digital Green Innovation for Industry 5.0 through Capability Reconfiguration: Strategically Oriented Insights. Systems, 12(9), 341.
Zhang, Y., & Jin, S. (2023). How Does Digital Transformation Increase Corporate Sustainability? The Moderating Role of Top Management Teams. Systems, 11(7), 355.
Zupic, I., & Cater, R. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Review of Administration, Society and Innovation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RASI, in accordance with Law No. 9,610 of February 19, 1998, which amends, updates and consolidates Brazilian copyright law and makes other provisions, adopts the following conditions of the Copyright Assignment:
1. RASI maintains, with the transfer of copyrights, the possession of rights over the content published;
2. The author retains his moral rights of the content, including the right to be identified as the author whenever the content is published;
3. Despite the attribution of copyright, the author retains the right to reuse the material in future collections of his own work without encumbrance. The acknowledgments of the previous publication in the RASI are the only requirements in such cases;
4. The author may make photocopies of the content, or distribute it by electronic mail or fax, provided that they are intended for their own classes and for the purpose of meeting research objectives, provided that: (a) such copies are not resold and (b) reference to the original source of the publication and the name of the RASI are clearly indicated on all copies made of the document.
