The Quadruple Helix and its relationship with the vision of the future of consolidated Science and Technology Parks in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20401/rasi.6.2.422Keywords:
Quadruple Helix, Science Technology Parks, Future Vision of STPs.Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to understand how society, as a representative of QH, operates in STPs consolidated from the perception of its managers.
Methodology: Multiple case studies were adopted in three consolidated Brazilian STPs. Data were collected through field notes, documents and interviews, triangulated and subjected to content analysis.
Findings: Among the results stand out the associations, liberal professionals and collective as representatives of society, it is perceived in a beneficial and active way, which varies according to the studied STP, and there are strong relations of society with the future conceptions of the STPs.
Social and Practical Implications: The Scientific and Technological Parks (STPs) have evolved their function beyond a space for job and income generation, the future of STPs has been approached as a diffuse space in the city that acts far beyond its walls, directly impacting society. This connection with society goes back to the Quadruple Helix (QH) model, which presents theoretical needs in its representation and operationalization, especially in innovation environments.
Originality: This article contributes by elucidating the representations of society and their characterization, bringing differentiation in peripheral environments, contributes to the description of the ways of connecting society and also by pointing out the different paths that are pursued to increase the rapprochement with society.
Downloads
References
Anprotec – Associação Nacional de entidades promotoras de empreendimentos Inovadores. (2015) Propostas de Políticas Públicas para Parques Tecnológicos e Incubadoras de Empresas. Brasília-DF: MCTI.
Arnkil, R., Järvensivu, A., Koski, P., & Piirainen, T. (2010). Exploring quadruple helix outlining user-oriented innovation models (Final Report on Quadruple Helix Research for the CLIQ project- Working Papers). Finland: Work Research Centre, University of Tampere.
Audy, J.L.N. & Knebel, P.. (2015). Tecnopuc: pessoas, criatividade e inovação. Porto Alegre: EdipucRS.
Audy, J.L.N. & Piqué, J. (2016). Dos parques científicos e tecnológicos aos ecossistemas de inovação. Brasília - DF: Anprotec.
Bardin, L. (2016). Análise de Conteúdo. Tradução Luís Antero Reto, Augusto Pinheiro. São Paulo: Edições 70.
Cai, Y. (2015). What contextual factors shape ‘innovation in innovation’? Integration of insights from the Triple Helix and the institutional logics perspective. Social Science Information, 54(3), 299-326.
Campanella, F., Peruta, M. R. D, Bresciani, S. & Dezi, L. (2017). Quadruple Helix and firms' performance: an empirical verification in Europe. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42 (2), SI, 267-284.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). 'Mode 3'and'quadruple helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46 (3-4), 201-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
Carayannis, E. G., & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The quadruple/quintuple innovation helixes and smart specialisation strategies for sustainable and inclusive growth in europe and beyond. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 212-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8
European Commission. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisations (RIS3). Brussels: European Union.
Etzkowitz, H.; Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix—University-Industry-Government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, 14 (1), 14–19. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2480085
Farré-Perdiguer, M.; Sala-Rios, M. & Torres-Solé, T. (2016). Network analysis for the study of technological collaboration in spaces for innovation. Science and technology parks and their relationship with the university. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13 (8), 1-12.
Fonseca, C. (1999). Quando cada caso NÃO é um caso. Revista Brasileira da Educação, 10, 58-78.
Henriques, I. C, Sobreiro, V.A. & Kimura, H. (2018). Science and technology park: Future challenges. Technology in Society, 53, 144-160.
Godoy, A. S. (2005). Refletindo sobre critérios de qualidade da pesquisa qualitativa. Revista Eletrônica de Gestão Organizacional, 3 (2), 80-89.
IASP - International Association of Science Parks and Areas of Innovation. (2015) The role of STPs and areas of innovation. Disponível em< http://www.iasp.ws/the-role-of-stps-and-innovation-areas > Acesso em: 03 set. 2015.
Leydesdorff, L., Park, H.W & Lengyel, B. (2014). A routine for measuring synergy in university-industry-government relations: mutual information as a Triple-Helix and Quadruple-Helix indicator. Scientometrics, 99, p. 27-35.
Lincoln, Y. S & Guba, E. G. (1986) But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New directions for evaluation, 30, 73-84.
Machado, A., Silva, A. R. L., Borba, M. L. & Catapan, A. H. (2015). Habitats de inovação: possibilidades sustentáveis para a sociedade. In: XXV Conferência Anprotec de Empreendedorismo e Ambientes de Inovação, Cuiabá. Anais... Cuiabá, p. 19.
Machado, H.V., Lazzarotti, F. & Bencke, F.F. (2018) Innovation models and technological parks: Interaction between parks and innovation agents. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 13 (2), 104-114.
Mineiro, A.A.C., Souza, D.L., Vieira, K.C., Castro, C.C. & Brito, M.J. (2018). Da Hélice Tríplice a Quíntupla: Uma Revisão Sistemática. Economia & Gestão, 18 (51), 77-93.
Mineiro, A.A.C., Souza, T. A. & Castro, C.C. (2018). A Operacionalização das Hélices Quádrupla e Quíntupla a partir de uma Meta-Síntese. Anais do XLII Encontro da ANPAD, Curitiba-PR.
Mineiro, A.A.C., Castro C.C. & Amaral, M. (2019). Quem são Os Atores da Hélice Quádrupla e Quíntupla? Casos Múltiplos em Parques Científicos e Tecnológicos consolidados. In Anais… XXII Seminários de Administração, SemeAd, São Paulo-SP.
Mulyaningsih, H. D. (2015). Enhancing innovation in quadruple helix perspective: The case of the business incubators in Indonesia. International Business Management, 9 (4), 367-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ibm.2015.367.371
Nordberg, K. (2015). Enabling Regional Growth in Peripheral Non-University Regions-The Impact of a Quadruple Helix Intermediate Organisation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6 (2), 334-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0241-z
Parry, M. (2018) The Future of Science Parks and Areas of Innovation: Science and Technology Parks Shaping the Future. World Technopolis Review, 7 (1), 44-58.
Pascoal, A. & Cabrita, M.R. (2016). Innovation Ecosystems Centred in EU-Based Science Parks: Recent Past and new Trends. 4th International Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (ICIE), Toronto, Canada. Anais ... ICIE 2016, p. 367-373.
PqTec – Parque Tecnológico de São José dos Campos. (2019). Relatório de Atividades 2017-2018. Acadêmica Agência de Comunicação.
PUC – Pontifícia Universidade Católica (2018). http://www.pucrs.br/tecnopuc/ consultado em 03-08-2019.
Ruuska, I., & Teigland, R. (2009). Ensuring project success through collective competence and creative conflict in public–private partnerships–A case study of Bygga Villa, a Swedish triple helix e-government initiative. International Journal of Project Management, 27(4), 323-334.
Saad, M., & Zawdie, G. (2005). From technology transfer to the emergence of a triple helix culture: The experience of Algeria in innovation and technological capability development. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 17(1), 89-103.
Schoonmaker, M.G & Carayannis, E.G. (2013). Mode 3: A Proposed Classification Scheme for the Knowledge Economy and Society. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4 (4), 556-577.
Urriago, A. R. V, Gil, A. B. & Rico, A. M. Science and Technology Parks and cooperation for innovation: Empirical evidence from Spain. Research Policy. v. 45, pg 137-147. 2016.
Van Horne, C.; Dutot, V. (2017). Challenges in technology transfer: an actor perspective in a quadruple helix environment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9503-6
Yin, R. K. Estudo de Caso. (2014). Planejamento e Métodos. 5ª ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Zouain, D. M., Damião, D. & Catharino, M. (2006). Urban Technology Parks Model as instrument of Public Policies for regional/local development: Technology Park of Sao Paulo. In Anais… XXII IASP - World Conference on Science and Technology Parks. Proceedings.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Review of Administration, Society and Innovation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RASI, in accordance with Law No. 9,610 of February 19, 1998, which amends, updates and consolidates Brazilian copyright law and makes other provisions, adopts the following conditions of the Copyright Assignment:
1. RASI maintains, with the transfer of copyrights, the possession of rights over the content published;
2. The author retains his moral rights of the content, including the right to be identified as the author whenever the content is published;
3. Despite the attribution of copyright, the author retains the right to reuse the material in future collections of his own work without encumbrance. The acknowledgments of the previous publication in the RASI are the only requirements in such cases;
4. The author may make photocopies of the content, or distribute it by electronic mail or fax, provided that they are intended for their own classes and for the purpose of meeting research objectives, provided that: (a) such copies are not resold and (b) reference to the original source of the publication and the name of the RASI are clearly indicated on all copies made of the document.
