Inovação Responsável no Âmbito da Gestão e Negócios
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20401/rasi.4.1.158Keywords:
Pesquisa e Inovação Responsáveis, Inovação Responsável, Inovação, Estudo bibliométrico.Abstract
Essa pesquisa teve por objetivo analisar a produção científica sobre a aplicação do conceito de inovação responsável voltada à área de gestão e negócios. Através de um estudo bibliométrico, foram identificados trinta e três artigos internacionais e um nacional. A análise de conteúdo apontou que a maioria dos estudos são voltados para a governança da inovação e sua relação com políticas públicas. Outros estudos abordaram o processo de desenvolvimento da inovação responsável, o âmbito da inovação, a relação com os stakeholders e ética. As lentes teóricas utilizadas nos estudos se voltaram para governança, recursos, custos de transação e responsabilidade social corporativa. As pesquisas aplicadas limitam-se as áreas de saúde e alimentos, adoção de tecnologia verde, pequenas empresas, sistemas de informação, superinteligência e nanotecnologia. Se sugere, por fim, a realização de pesquisas utilizando outras lentes teóricas, como a Teoria Institucional e Capacidades Dinâmicas, assim como avaliar de que forma a universidade influencia a responsabilidade na inovação daquelas empresas com que se relaciona.
Downloads
References
Arentshorst, M. E., de Cock Buning, T., Boon, W. P., & Broerse, J. E. (2015). Prospecting responsible technology paths: Management options for an appropriate societal embedding of medical neuroimaging. Science and Public Policy, 42(6), 775-788.
Burget, M., Bardone, E., & Pedaste, M. (2017). Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review. Science and engineering ethics, 23(1), 1-19.
Brundage, M. (2015). Taking superintelligence seriously: Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies by Nick Bostrom (Oxford University Press, 2014). Futures, 72, 32-35.
Ceccaldi, V. (2016). How Responsible Innovation Strategies Emerge in Very Small Enterprises: The Case of a Small Wine-Growers’ Cooperative. In Proceedings of The 11th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship 15-16 September 2016 (p. 116).
Comissão Europeia (2002) The Sixth Framework Programme. Disponível em: < https://ec.europa.eu/research/fp6/index_en.cfm>
_______________ (2013) The Seventh Framework Programme. Disponível em: < https://ec.europa.eu/research/fp7/index_en.cfm>
de Bakker, E., de Lauwere, C., Hoes, A. C., & Beekman, V. (2014). Responsible research and innovation in miniature: Information asymmetries hindering a more inclusive ‘nanofood’development. Science and Public Policy, 41(3), 294-305.
de Oslo, M. (1997). Manual de Oslo. Recuperado de http://gestiona. com. br/wpcontent/uploads/2013/06/Manual-de-OSLO-2005. pdf.
de Saille, S., & Medvecky, F. (2016). Innovation for a steady state: a case for responsible stagnation. Economy and Society, 45(1), 1-23.
D'Silva, J., Robinson, D. K., & Shelley-Egan, C. (2012). A game with rules in the making–how the high probability of waiting games in nanomedicine is being mitigated through distributed regulation and responsible innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(6), 583-602.
European Commission, 2013. The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation [WWW Document], URL <http://ec.europa.eu/research/ horizon2020/index_en.cfm?pg=h2020>.
Fisher, E., & Maricle, G. (2014). Higher-level responsiveness? Socio-technical integration within US and UK nanotechnology research priority setting. Science and Public Policy, 42(1), 72-85.
Foley, R. W., & Wiek, A. (2014). Scenarios of nanotechnology innovation vis-à-vis sustainability challenges. Futures, 64, 1-14.
Galasso, A., & Tombak, M. (2014). Switching to Green: The Timing of Socially Responsible Innovation. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 23(3), 669-691.
Halme, M., & Korpela, M. (2014). Responsible Innovation toward sustainable development in small and medium?sized enterprises: a resource perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(8), 547-566.
Khan, S. S., Timotijevic, L., Newton, R., Coutinho, D., Llerena, J. L., Ortega, S., ... & Urban, C. (2016). The framing of innovation among European research funding actors: Assessing the potential for ‘responsible research and innovation’in the food and health domain. Food Policy, 62, 78-87.
Mejlgaard, N., & Bloch, C. (2012). Science in society in Europe. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 695-700.
Nações Unidas (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. General Assembly. Seventieth session Agenda items 15 and 116.
Nielsen, M. V. (2016). The concept of responsiveness in the governance of research and innovation. Science and Public Policy, 43(6), 831-839.
Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751-760.
Pandza, K., & Ellwood, P. (2013). Strategic and ethical foundations for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(5), 1112-1125.
Paredes-Frigolett, H. (2016). Modeling the effect of responsible research and innovation in quadruple helix innovation systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110, 126-133.
Pavie, X., & Carthy, D. (2015). Leveraging uncertainty: a practical approach to the integration of responsible innovation through design thinking. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 1040-1049.
Petrait?, M., & ?ei?yt?, J. (2014). Conceptual Model for Responsible Innovation Management in Business Organizations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 121-124.
Pyszka, A. (2012). Socially Responsible Innovations (SRI) from a Transactional Cost Perspective-A Chance for Growth and Development or a Waste of Time and Money?. Business and non-profit organizations facing increased competition and growing customers’demands, 18, 57.
Ratiu, P., & Mortan, M. (2013). Ethical Aspects Of Decision-Making In Agri-Food Enterprises.
Robinson, D. K. (2009). Co-evolutionary scenarios: An application to prospecting futures of the responsible development of nanotechnology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(9), 1222-1239.
Rodríguez, H., Fisher, E., & Schuurbiers, D. (2013). Integrating science and society in European Framework Programmes: Trends in project-level solicitations. Research Policy, 42(5), 1126-1137.
Spena, T.R, & De Chiara, A. (2012). CSR, innovation strategy and supply chain management: toward an integrated perspective. International Journal of Technology Management, 58(1/2), 83-108.
Savoia, A., Lefebvre, B., Millot, G., & Bocquet, B. (2017). The Science Shop Concept and its Implementation in a French University. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, (1), 97-117.
Schaper-Rinkel, P. (2013). The role of future-oriented technology analysis in the governance of emerging technologies: The example of nanotechnology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(3), 444-452.
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 505-532.
Stahl, B. C. (2013). Responsible research and innovation: The role of privacy in an emerging framework. Science and Public Policy, 40(6), 708-716.
________, Eden, G., Jirotka, M., & Coeckelbergh, M. (2014a). From computer ethics to responsible research and innovation in ICT: The transition of reference discourses informing ethics-related research in information systems. Information & Management, 51(6), 810-818.
________, McBride, N., Wakunuma, K., & Flick, C. (2014b). The empathic care robot: A prototype of responsible research and innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 84, 74-85.
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568-1580.
van Geenhuizen, M., & Ye, Q. (2014). Responsible innovators: open networks on the way to sustainability transitions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 87, 28-40.
Voegtlin, C., & Scherer, A. G. (2017). Responsible innovation and the innovation of responsibility: Governing sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(2), 227-243.
Von Schomberg95, R. (2012). The quest for the “right” impacts of science and technology. An outlook towards a framework for responsible research and innovation. Les nanotechnologies: vers un changement d’échelle éthique?, 269.
Wiek, A., Foley, R. W., Guston, D. H., & Bernstein, M. J. (2016). Broken promises and breaking ground for responsible innovation–intervention research to transform business-as-usual in nanotechnology innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(6), 639-650.
Yenicioglu, B., & Suerdem, A. (2015). Participatory new product development–a framework for deliberately collaborative and continuous innovation design. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1443-1452.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
RASI, in accordance with Law No. 9,610 of February 19, 1998, which amends, updates and consolidates Brazilian copyright law and makes other provisions, adopts the following conditions of the Copyright Assignment:
1. RASI maintains, with the transfer of copyrights, the possession of rights over the content published;
2. The author retains his moral rights of the content, including the right to be identified as the author whenever the content is published;
3. Despite the attribution of copyright, the author retains the right to reuse the material in future collections of his own work without encumbrance. The acknowledgments of the previous publication in the RASI are the only requirements in such cases;
4. The author may make photocopies of the content, or distribute it by electronic mail or fax, provided that they are intended for their own classes and for the purpose of meeting research objectives, provided that: (a) such copies are not resold and (b) reference to the original source of the publication and the name of the RASI are clearly indicated on all copies made of the document.
