Communication practices in social media: voices and experiences of people with disabilities and their families considering theories of practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20401/rasi.12.2.1070Keywords:
Social media, People with disabilities, Theories of practiceAbstract
Theories of practice suggest social practices are expressed through actions and speeches incorporating material elements, skills, and meanings. This study explores communication practices in social media content production and consumption by People with Disabilities (PwD) and their families, using practice theories. The research is exploratory and qualitative, using in- depth interviews and content analysis with Iramuteq. For PwD, social media is a tool for work, education, social interaction, and entertainment. Their families use these platforms to celebrate achievements, inspire others, and advocate for PwD rights. Findings show social media communication for PwD represents societal inclusion, with mobile phones as the primary engagement means. PwD demonstrate autonomy, self-confidence, and creative talents through these platforms. For family members, this communication fosters belonging, inspiration, trust, expression, and voice. The research emphasizes the need for public policies supporting assistive technology funding and social media training for PwD and families. It advocates support networks among PwD families, connecting experienced PwD with newcomers to social media, and training health, social care, and education professionals to recognize PwD' and families' faith as resilience resources in disability contexts.
Downloads
References
Abel, S., Machin, T., & Brownlow, C. (2019). Support, socialise and advocate: An exploration of the stated purposes of Facebook autism groups. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 61, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2019.01.009.
Anderson, S., Araten‐Bergman, T., & Steel, G. (2023). Adults with intellectual disabilities as users of social media: A scoping review. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(4), 544–
https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12534.
Araújo, M. A. F., Silva, R. A., Melo, E. S., Silva, M. A. M., & Freitas, C. A. S. L. (2018). Redes sociais de apoio e famílias de crianças com deficiência: Uma revisão integrativa. Investigação Qualitativa Em Saúde, 2, 585–594.
Baker, S. M., Gentry, J. W., & Rittenburg, T. L. (2005). Building understanding of the domain of consumer vulnerability. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(2), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146705280622.
Baldassin, V., Shimizu, H. E., & Fachin-Martins, E. (2018). Computer assistive technology and associations with quality of life for individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 27(3), 597–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1804-9.
Bittencourt, Z. Z. L. C., Françozo, M. F. de C., Monteiro, C. R., & Francisco, D. D. (2011). Surdez, redes sociais e proteção social. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 16(1), 769–776. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-81232011000700007.
Borgos-Rodriguez, K., Ringland, K. E., & Piper, A. M. (2019). MyAutsomeFamilyLife: Analyzing parents of children with developmental disabilities on YouTube. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359196.
Buchholz, M., Ferm, U., & Holmgren, K. (2019). Digital Communication and Social Media for People with Communicative and Cognitive Disabilities. Em Everday technologies in healthcare (1 ed, 379). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351032186.
Camargo, B. V., & Justo, A. M. (2013). IRAMUTEQ: Um software gratuito para análise de dados textuais. Temas Em Psicologia, 21(2), 513–518. https://doi.org/10.9788/tp2013.2-16.
Castro Júnior, G., Prometi, D., Santana, N. G., & Francisco, G. S. A. M. (2024). Explorando a interseção entre algoritmos, redes sociais e inclusão da pessoa Surda. Liinc em Revista, 20X(1), e7024. https://doi.org/10.18617//liinc.v20i1.7024.
Corrêa, S. C. H., & Gosling, M. de S. (2021). Smart tourism destinations from the perspective of travelers with disability. Almatourism - Journal of Tourism, Culture and Territorial Development, 23, 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2036-5195/11472.
Corrêa, S. C. H., & Gosling, M. S. (2023). A experiência turística inteligente na perspectiva do viajante. Turismo: Visão e Ação, 25(1), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.14210/rtva.v25n1.p72-93.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Investigação qualitativa e projeto de pesquisa: Escolhendo entre cinco abordagens (3rd ed.). Penso.
De Souza, M. A. R., Wall, M. L., Thuler, A. C. D. M. C., Lowen, I. M. V., & Peres, A. M. (2018). The use of IRAMUTEQ software for data analysis in qualitative research. Journal of School of Nursing USP, 52, e03353. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2017015003353.
Dubost, N. (2018). Disability and consumption: A state of the art. Recherche et Applications En Marketing (English Edition), 33(2), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051570718764882 .
Faria, M. D., Casotti, L. M., & Carvalho, J. L. F. S. (2016). A decisão de compra de veículos adaptados por consumidores com deficiência motora. Revista de Administração da Unimep, 14(3), 102–131. https://doi.org/10.15600/1679-5350/rau.v14n3p102-131.
Faria, M. D., & Casotti, L. M. (2019). “Welcome to Holland!” People with Down syndrome as vulnerable consumers. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2245–2267. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2017-0164.
Feiereisen, S., Rasolofoarison, D., De Valck, K., & Schmitt, J. (2019). Understanding emerging adults’ consumption of TV series in the digital age: A practice-theory-based approach. Journal of Business Research, 95(January 2018), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.024.
Ferreira, F. L., & Christino, J. M. M. (2021). O ciclo de evolução das práticas de consumo: Uma revisão sobre o comportamento do consumidor visto sob a ótica da teoria da prática. XLV Encontro Da ANPAD - EnANPAD 2021, 1–23.
http://anpad.com.br/uploads/articles/114/approved/a07c2f3b3b907aaf8436a26c6d77f0a2.pdf.
Furr, J. B., Carreiro, A., & McArthur, J. A. (2016). Strategic approaches to disability disclosure on social media. Disability & Society, 31(10), 1353–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1256272.
Gabriel, M., & Kiso, R. (2020). Marketing na era digital (2nd ed.). Atlas.
Halicki, Z., Stadler, A., Cunha, S. K., & Bulgacov, Y. L. M. (2021). Comunidades de Prática: A construção de conhecimento em um grupo de pesquisa. RASI - Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação, 7(3), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.20401/rasi.7.3.503.
Hemsley, B., Given, F., Almond, B., Cooper, J., Smith, R., Young, K., & Wright, E. (2024). A critical review of literature on social media and developmental communication disability: Implications for future social media and generative AI research. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 11(2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-024-00297-9.
IBGE. (2023). Pessoas com deficiência 2022—PNAD continua—Divulgação dos resultados gerais, 41. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE. https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/media/com_mediaibge/arquivos/0a9afaed04d79830f73a16136dba23b9.pdf.
Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to Its methodology (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Lei nº. 13.146/2015. (2015). Estatuto da pessoa com deficiência 69. https://educa.ibge.gov.br/jovens/conheca-o-brasil/populacao/20551-pessoas-com-deficiencia.html.
Magaudda, P. (2011). When materiality “bites back”: Digital music consumption practices in the age of dematerialization. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540510390499.
Mazieri, M. R., Quoniam, L. M., Reymond, D., & Cunha, K. C. T. (2022). Use of IRAMUTEQ for content analysis based on descending hierarchical classification and correspondence factor analysis. Brazilian Journal of Marketing, 21(5), 1978–2011. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v21i5.21290.
Mick, D. G., Pettigrew, S., Pechmann, C., & Ozanne, J. L. (2012). Transformative Consumer Reseaech for personal and collective well-being. In: D. G. Mick, D. G., Pettigrew, S., Pechmann, C., & Ozanne, J. L. (Eds.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Oliveira, R. D., & Okimoto, M. L. L. R. (2022). Tecnologias assistivas relacionadas à moda para pessoas com deficiência visual: Uma revisão sistemática. DObra[s] - Revista Da Associação Brasileira de Estudos de Pesquisas Em Moda, 35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26563/dobras.i35.1459.
Ramos, R. C., Tayt-son, D. B. C., & Rocha, A. R. C. (2020, October 14). A volta da marmita: Ressignificação do consumo à luz da Teoria da Prática. XLIV Encontro Da ANPAD - EnANPAD 2020.
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203335697-23.
Schatzki, T. R. (2005). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, knorr K. Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (2nd ed., p. 213). Routledge.
Sannon, S., Young, J., Shusas, E., & Forte, A. (2023). Disability activism on social media: Sociotechnical challenges in the pursuit of visibility. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581333.
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how It changes. Sage.
Silva, L. L. A., Casotti, L. M., & Moreira, C. S. C. (2020, October 14). O hábito do banho: Significados e práticas de consumo. XLIV Encontro Da ANPAD - EnANPAD 2020.
Torre, J. (2023). Vulnerability: The human depth of a principle of bioethics. Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética, 21, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.14422/rib.i21.y2023.007.
Warde, A. (2017). Consumption: A sociological analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55682-0.
WPT. (2023). O movimento web para todos. WPT.
Yanaze, M. H., Barsano, P. R., Yanaze, L. K. H., Almeida, E., & Campos, A.(2022). Marketing digital: Conceitos e práticas (1st ed.). Saraiva Uni.
Yang, C. C., Holden, S. M., & Ariati, J. (2021). Social media and psychological well-being among youth: The multidimensional model of social media use. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 24(3), 631-650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-021-00359-z.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Review of Administration, Society and Innovation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RASI, in accordance with Law No. 9,610 of February 19, 1998, which amends, updates and consolidates Brazilian copyright law and makes other provisions, adopts the following conditions of the Copyright Assignment:
1. RASI maintains, with the transfer of copyrights, the possession of rights over the content published;
2. The author retains his moral rights of the content, including the right to be identified as the author whenever the content is published;
3. Despite the attribution of copyright, the author retains the right to reuse the material in future collections of his own work without encumbrance. The acknowledgments of the previous publication in the RASI are the only requirements in such cases;
4. The author may make photocopies of the content, or distribute it by electronic mail or fax, provided that they are intended for their own classes and for the purpose of meeting research objectives, provided that: (a) such copies are not resold and (b) reference to the original source of the publication and the name of the RASI are clearly indicated on all copies made of the document.
