Particularities in financing tools: A case study of an Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil

Particularities in financing tools: A case study of an Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil

Autores

  • Daniel Pereira de Almeida Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
  • Thiago Borges Renault Universidade Federal Rural do Rio Janeiro
  • Gerd Brantes Angelkorte Universidade Federal do Rio Janeiro
  • Marcus Vinicius de Araujo Fonseca Universidade Federal do Rio Janeiro
  • Sérgio Yates Universidade Federal do Rio Janeiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20401/rasi.6.2.438

Palavras-chave:

Hélice Tríplice, Política de CTI, Inovação

Resumo

Abstract: This work aims to analyze the objectives and interactions of innovation financing tools from a point of view of a technology, research and innovation foundation. It brings as subject the case of the Technology, Research and Innovation Foundation of the State of Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), and its incorporation of a Technology Board. Working side by side with a Scientific Board, it faces the challenge of interact, finance, and boost innovation, whereas the Foundation carries more than 40 years of basic research funding (1980 until 2019) the financing of innovation activities was incorporated in 2002. With the R&D activities in Brazil centered on public University, Research Institutes and only a small presence in companies (only 5% of the innovative companies perform R&D), FAPERJ’s faces the challenge of create financing tools that improves the interaction between these actors. The sample analyzed in this study relates the eligibility criteria used in the FAPERJ’s Technological Development Support (ADT) with similar and inspiring program, the United States of America Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR). As result, we have found the lack of incentives for interaction between universities and business sector, showing that only a small part of the projects financed by FAPERJ can reach the commercialization.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

BRASIL. Lei nº 10.973, de 02 de dezembro de 2004. Dispõe sobre incentivos à inovação e à pesquisa científica e tecnológica no ambiente produtivo e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília, DF, 3 dez. 2004. Disponível em: http://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/fed/lei/2004/lei-10973-2-dezembro-2004-534975-publicacaooriginal-21531-pl.html. Acess in: apr. 01 2019.
Cross, D.; Thomson, S.; Sinclair, A. (2018). Research in Brazil: a report for CAPES by Clarivate Analytics. Clarivate Analytics. Disponível em:
<https://www.capes.gov.br/images/stories/download/diversos/17012018-CAPES-InCitesReport-Final.pdf> Acess in: apr. 01 2019.
WEB OF SCIENCE GROUP. (2018). Research in Brazil: Funding excellence. Disponível em: <https://jornal.usp.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ClarivateReport_2013-2018.pdf> Acess in: oct. 12 2019.
GOVERNO DO ESTADO DO RIO DE JANEIRO. Decreto nº 3.290, de 16 de junho de 1980. Cria a Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ). Disponível em: <http://www.faperj.br/downloads/decreto_3290.pdf>. Acess in: apr. 01 2019.
IBGE. (2015). Pesquisa de Inovação (PINTEC). In Pesquisa de Inovação 2014. https://doi.org/ISSN 0101-4234
OECD/Eurostat/EU. (1997). Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data (OECD). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264192263-en
OECD. (2015). Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development. In The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-en
Quintal, R. S., & Terra, B. R. C. dos S. e S. R. (2014). Políticas organizacionais de ciência, tecnologia e inovação e gestão da propriedade industrial: uma análise comparativa em Instituições de Pesquisa. Gestão & Produção. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x1053/13
World Intellectual Property Organization (2018). Global innovation index 2018: energizing the world with innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleu and Geneva: Cornell University; The Business School for the World; World Intelectual Property Organization. Disponível em: <https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/home> Acess in: apr. 01 2019.

Downloads

Publicado

2020-05-19

Edição

Seção

Ensaios Teóricos